Monday, February 27, 2012

Politicians Dark Dirty Little Secret

If I Vote No….

The Government can’t grow.

This is what Obama, Romney and the rest of the Collectivist Elitists, which includes all of the loudmouths in the “Conservative Media” like Rush Limbaugh, Sean Hannity and others don’t want you to know.


How Can I Help??

It seems that the Republican Party has a new slogan and almost all of these politicians are using it.

The slogan is “How Can I Help?”

I first saw this as a Facebook ad for “Tea-Party” (Statist if you ask me) Republican Scott Des Jarlais of the 4th district of Tennessee.

Well for all of those slippery slimy politicians who “Want To Help”

I want them to ask a question. In every debate, in every committee, in every hearing, in every caucus. Even in the bathroom where they are cutting deals with other politicians.

That question is,

“If this bill passes will it increase the size, cost, extend the reach

and power of the government?”

See what they say to that.

Thought you should know.

Tuesday, February 21, 2012

Sucker Punch

If you go on Facebook you will be peppered by ads.

Some of the ads are for people who want to restore these United States back to the Constitutional Republic that it was.

Some of these ads are for political parasites and opportunists who want to get elected and reelected and couldn’t care less about what is going on……….

In my opinion, one such political parasite is Iowa Representative, Steven King.

He is using the fear of Obama as a way of getting reelected.

Now if Representative King is for real, please send him the following letter.

Representative Steve King

1131 Longworth Office Building

Washington, DC. 20515

Dear Congressman King:

I know that you are alarmed at the continued growth in the

Size, Cost, Reach and Power of the government.

My request of you is quite simple.

In every committee meeting no matter how small, ask the following question;

“If this proposal goes through will it increase the size, cost, reach or power of the government?”

When the reply to your question is in the affirmative tell the sponsor that you are going to vote no on that bill or proposal for those reasons.

We have too much government now.

If you will do this and keep a tally and use your franking privileges to send a bulletin or a letter detailing the yea’s and nay’s you will go a long way in helping us slow the growth of government.

The only thing I ask other than that, is that you vote no on all of these little increases, the sum total of which make up this massive Federal Budget.

Keep a tally and let me know from month to month what the yea’s and nay’s are and I’ll spread the word.

Sincerely Yours

John Q. Citizen

Little drops of water,

Little grains of sand,

Make the mighty ocean,

And the pleasant land….

Julia Fletcher Carney

Let’s see if he will do it. I really doubt it.

Thought you should know.

Saturday, February 18, 2012

Open Letter To Ron Paul


You Gotta make this campaign, Rock!

And only you got that power, Doc!

Tell the people the truth

about all you know

or---Joe may say it aint so.

Tell the people if you are elected president

You are going to work with the House of Representatives to

Reduce the size, cost, reach and power of the government.

We have too much government as is

and it’s getting worse.

It’s breaking our backs

And emptying our purse.

Now what everybody in the House of Representatives needs to do is to ask a question.

That is TRUE!!!!

That question needs to be asked of any bill, whether that bill is on the floor or in a committee, or a subcommittee or a caucus.

Doc, you got to tell them to ask that question and ask it constantly.



That’s what you got to do DOC

If you want your campaign to Rock.

Disturb Your Congressman Today!

So you want to throw a wrench into the works good!
The first thing you need to do is go to The US House or Representatives web site.
You then need to look up your Congressman.
Go to the box on the upper right and type in your zip code.
This will bring up a page and a picture of your Congressman will appear on the left hand side.
By the picture will be a link to your Congressman’s web site.
Click the link.
Now you are on your Congressman’s personal web site.
The next thing you do is to find out if your Congressman sponsored any legislation.
On your Congressman’s site there should be a link to any legislation that he sponsored.
It may say, legislative work or sponsored legislation.
Click that link and pick one of the latest bills. After all there will be many pieces of legislation. These clowns vomit out more and more legislation each and every year.
Then write your Congressman the following letter.

Washington, DC. 20515
Dear Congressman :
I understand you introduced the bill known as the “(Title or Bill Number)” into Congress.
Did you write that bill?
If not who did?
I want to know and I want your answer sent back to me in the enclosed stamped self addressed envelope.
John Q. Citizen
This will do more to straighten things out than a thousand tea parties.


Oh yes I forgot to mention. After I am elected I will sponsor two bills.
I'm going to write them myself.
One bill gets rid of the Federal Election Commission forthwith.
The FEC is designed to make sure you can't run for office.
You can't jump through all the hoops. But a Socialist or a member of
a political party can. We need to get rid of them (especially these "conservatives" who do nothing but compromise (see "Less Is More") and get ordinary people in who have the brains to Vote No on any bill that would increase the size, cost, extend the reach and power of the government like me.

The other bill cuts off all TAXPAYER funds from any and all Non-GovernmentalOrganizations.
Think of it. If you are Pro-Life do you want your tax dollars going to "Planned Parenthood." If you believe in the US Constitution and Bill of Rights, first 10 amendments, do you want Sarah Brady getting a penny of your money????

I don't think so.

Just thought you should know.

Sunday, February 12, 2012

How To Deal With A Lunatic

I heard about Mr. Sarti's plight the other day.

Do you think Mr. Sarti is crazy????

Judge for yourself.

My suggestion to Mr. Sarti is to sue Dr. Andre C. Olivier for at least 100 million dollars.

This suit will be for defamation of character.

After he finds an attorney to represent him he needs to call a public press conference to announce the law suit. He should invite any and all members of the media.

At this press conference Mr. Sarti needs to bring up the McNaughton rule

The McNaughton essentially allows these pricks to grab you and throw you in a mental institution. No trial is needed.

Gee what ever happened to the Bill of Rights??????

Where is the American Civil Liberties Union??????

The ACLU jumps on all this stuff that is destructive to these United States.

However they never jump on anything that is destructive to individual liberties (like the McNaughton Rule).

Why Not ????

Why Not ????

Why Not ????

Why Not ????

Why Not???????


Wednesday, February 8, 2012

Natural Gas

Notes on the Keystone Pipeline

Essentially what it is doing is taking British oil, from the British Dominion of Canada

Piping it through the United States and putting it on tankers which will take the oil to South America and Europe.

That’s cool

The United States makes money putting the pipeline together, right????

Well all the refineries are down by the Gulf of Mexico around Houston, TX.

That’s true however our refineries are operating at 100 percent of capacity.

It’s not a question of oil it’s a question of refining capacity.

We haven’t built a refinery in these United States since 1976.

That is because of the Environmental Protection Agency.

They have made it difficult to get through the permitting process.

These liberal socialists don’t want refineries to be built so that the price of gasoline will be 8 or 9 dollars a gallon. They have crimped the pipeline.

Now what would happen if the Environmental Protection Agency had its budget cut in the House of Representatives????

You may have some refineries built.

Thought you should know.


The Action Is In The Reaction

Destroying the Patriot Act.
The so called Patriot act was introduced into Congress as a result of the 9/11 attacks.
The Congressman who introduced the act was James Sensenbrenner.
(Various Pictures of Mr. Sensenbrenner.)
We all know that the Patriot Act does nothing to protect the American People from terrorism.
What it does it guts the 4, 5 and 7th Amendments from our Bill of Rights.
If you really want to fight this horrible piece of legislation which does nothing more than increase the size, cost, reach and power of the government.
I want you to write the following letter to Congressman Sensenbrenner.

Congressman James Sensenbrenner
2449 Rayburn House Office Building
Washington, DC. 20515
Dear Congressman Sensenbrenner:
I understand you introduced the bill known as the “Patriot Act” into Congress.
Did you write that bill?
If not who did?
I want to know and I want your answer sent back to me in the enclosed stamped self addressed envelope.
John Q. Citizen.

Congressman James Sensenbrenner’s

Article on the “Patriot Act” which lists "Tea Party" Congressmen who voted to extend it.

Sunday, February 5, 2012

The Famous Samuel Duck Letter

This is a great speech. I hope you have the time to read it.

My reference to this speech is in bold.

Samuel Duck on Bill Haslam

But Haslam looks so friendly.....
And he has money.....

With a heavy heart, I have decided to end my campaign for governor today.
Ordinarily, I would see this endeavor through to the end. However, I feel
the people of Tennessee is facing a significant threat from globalists in
the Republican Party. Several of these threats originate from Congress.
With bills like the Patriot Act fresh in our memory and Republicans like
Lindsey Graham proposing bills like a national RFID, as Republicans take
power in 2010 and 2012, I am forced to ask, "Who is going to protect us
from the Republicans? Another Republican?" Haslam will not defend us from
the Federal Government with the Republicans in charge any better than
Bredesen defended us from the Federal Government with the Democrats in
charge. At the TEA Party Convention in Gatlinburg, Haslam was asked if he
would defend Tennessee's right to sovereignty as protected by the 10th
Amendment. He responded, "It does take a group of governors [to defend
the 10th amendment]...It also takes electing the right people to
Congress" In his own words, Haslam is going to depend on other states and
Congress to defend Tennessee's 10th Amendment rights. Tennessee needs
stronger leadership than that.
One of my strengths as a candidate for governor is my awareness of
foreign policy. Many people hold the opinion that state offices do not
have to contend with foreign policy. Today, we are gathered in a town
that is suffering from the effects of Tennessee failing to properly
handle foreign policy.

A contractor with Center for Immigration Studies
(CIS) released a document
May 13, 2010 that reported up to 95% of
refugees entering the
United States were referred to the United States by
the UN High Commissioner of Refugees (UNHCR). This means the UN is
picking the refugees that are settling in the
US and not the US itself.
This business is very lucrative for case workers, who are now paid $1900
per head to place refugees. Furthermore, the UN places these refugees in
designated gateway communities. States are now complaining the UN is
placing refugees without local consultation, which results in unplanned
costs. Many of these refugees are Muslim. Many of the UN designated
communities are predominantly Christian. This often leads to conflicts
within the communities.
Nashville is one such community. If anyone in
Tennessee should understand the impact failing to properly deal with UN
policy has on
Tennessee, it is the citizens of Murfreesboro.

Next, I want to introduce you to an organization known as ICLEI. It
stands for International Council for Local Environmental Initiatives. The
concept of ICLEI first came to the US in 1992 we were presented with a
couple of provisions during the Earth Summit. One was the UN biodiversity
treaty, and the other was UN Sustainable Development Agenda 21 (or simply
Agenda 21). These provisions formalize the use of the environment to
promote a globalist, socialist agenda. George Bush I was the signatory
for the United States. You may recall, Bush spoke several times about the
emerging, "New World Order".

The Biodiversity and Agenda 21 provisions are basically two different
sides of the same coin. Biodiversity pertains to rural areas. Agenda 21
deals with urban areas. Fortunately, the Senate rejected Biodiversity and
Agenda 21, which should have killed these provisions for the United
States. However, the UN is no respecter of our Constitution. Here in
Tennessee, the United Nations has designated the Smokey Mountain National
Park an "international biosphere reserve". That is an effect of the
Biodiversity provision. Furthermore, after the Senate rejected Agenda 21,
the UN began using ICLEI to strike deals directly with US cities.
Knoxville is one of those cities. Article 1 Section 10 of the US
Constitution strictly prohibits this. "No State shall, without the
Consent of Congress...enter into any Agreement or Compact with another
State, or with a foreign Power..." Madison clarifies the purpose of this
clause in Federalist Paper 44. "This alteration is fully justified by the
advantage of uniformity in all points which relate to foreign powers." A
member city pays dues to ICLEI, and the city will hire a sustainability
manager. Ultimately, ICLEI will appoint members of an advisory panel to
help the city implement Agenda 21. This means your tax dollars are going
to implement a UN agenda. As Mayor of Knoxville, Bill Haslam has clearly
overseen the continued implementation of UN Agenda 21. This issue goes
beyond local sovereignty from federal government. It's worse. This
involves local sovereignty from international government. That is why
foreign policy is a key issue in this years gubernatorial election.

During an election where cap and trade is one of the key issues, do you
want governor who is working with ICLEI to implement 'green initiatives'?
[This section removed from original speech: ICLEI charges it's member
cities a fee for it's services. Ultimately, the tax payer is on the hook
for this fee. ICLEI appoints ministers to a city's government, which are
not elected by the voters. According to the Knoxville Energy Inventory
Analysis, Knoxville "joined the network" July 2007. August 2007, Mayor
Bill Haslam hosted the first meeting of the Energy and Sustainability
Task Force. There are 15 people on this committee. The 2009 CAFR shows
Knoxville was awarded over $2,000,000 in grants from the federal
government for sustainable development projects. As far as I can tell,
thus far the taxpayers in Knoxville have not been directly on the hook
for the cost of the ICLEI program. However, 2,000,000 federal dollars
comes from all of our taxes. That certainly adds an interesting wrinkle
to Knoxville's situation.]
The UN is no respecter of property rights. The 1976 UN Habitat Conference said, "Land ...cannot be treated as an ordinary asset, controlled by
individuals and subject to the pressures and inefficiencies of the
market. Private land ownership is also a principle instrument of
accumulation and concentration of wealth, therefore, contributes to
social injustice." So... private land ownership is a social injustice?
The 1998 UN report on global governance read, "Human activity...combined
with unprecedented increases in human numbers...are impinging on the
planet's basic life support system. Action must be taken now to control
the human activities that produce these risks" Harvey Ruvin, Vice Chair
of ICLEI said, "Individual rights will have to take a back seat to the

There is more to ICLEI than a pact with the UN designed to merge us into
world government. It promotes a pagan world view that sees humans as
harmful to the earth. Part of the UN biodiversity treaty reads, "Nature
has an integral set of different values (cultural, spiritual, and
material) where humans are one strand in nature's web and all living
creatures are considered equal. Therefore the natural way is the right
and human activities should be molded along nature's rhythms." Now, isn't
that such a nice, Christian concept? Your activities should be molded
along nature's rhythms. Molded by who?

Furthermore, Bill Haslam's campaign chairman is Howard Baker. I don't
mean to imply Haslam would ever intend to distance himself from Mr.
Baker, but he couldn't if he wanted to. Mr. Baker's name is part of every
ad Bill Haslam runs. "The Honorable Howard H Baker Jr., Honorary
Chairman" Howard Baker is a prominent member of the Council of Foreign
Relations (CFR), which is a group that often compromises United States
interests in order to promote global governance. There are about 5000
members of the CFR, including Tim Geithner, Hank Paulson, Henry
Kissinger, Bill Clinton, Joe Biden, and George Soros. In the 1970's Baker
was one of the senators responsible for the United States giving away the
Panama Canal. Amazingly, this is still making news over 30 years later.
Recently, Baker appeared jointly with Jimmy Carter. Carter praised the
decision as "the most courageous decision in the history of the U.S.
Congress." When Carter praises your foreign policy decisions, this is not
usually a good sign.

The CFR is also one of the forces behind globalization. In a paper titled
"Sovereignty and Globalisation" CFR President, Richard Haas wrote the
following. "At its core, globalisation entails the increasing volume,
velocity and importance of flows within and across borders of people,
ideas, greenhouse gases, goods, dollars, drugs, viruses, emails, weapons,
and a good deal else, challenging one of sovereignty's fundamental
principles: the ability to control what crosses borders in either
direction." The flow of people across borders is just one of the
mechanisms by which globalization challenges sovereignty. Other
mechanisms are greenhouse gases, drugs, and weapons. This last year the
H1N1 panic also challenged sovereignty. Simply put ties to the UN and CFR
erode our sovereignty, take away our rights, and threaten Christian

Bill Haslam's global leanings even show up in the way he conducts his
business. T Boone Pickens used to maintain a web site called Terror Free
Oil. There he listed companies who obtained all or most of their oil from
outside the Middle East. Companies like Sunoco, Hess, Kangaroo, and
Flying J, which Pilot recently purchased, obtained all or most of their
oil. Terror Free Oil also listed companies who purchased oil from the
Middle East. Right along with Exxon and British Petroleum was Pilot. If
other companies in Tennessee can get their oil from here, why can't
Pilot? Most people don't realize, we have oil wells right here in
Tennessee. Some of the land owners are paid not to pump. Haslam has
billions. Why is he not using them to help end our dependency on foreign
oil or at the very least blow the whistle on how the Federal government
is making the issue worse?

[struck from original speech: Many of you are also aware that Bill Haslam
joined Michael Bloomberg's Mayor's Coalition.
Many of you think of the
implication this has on the second Amendment. However, the city of New
York is also facing a mosque controversy of it's own. In New York's case,
St. Nicholas Church was destroyed when Muslims destroyed the World Trade
Center. After 9 years, New York still denies the congregation permission
to rebuild it's church, but if it were not for intense public pressure,
New York would be allowing a new mosque to be built near the same
location as the World Trade Center and the church.]
When I launched my campaign I placed the following in my expanded stand.
"All water collected and food grown and sold within the borders of
Tennessee should not be subject to Federal regulation." S510, which is a
bill that will put crushing regulations on small farmers is on the verge
of passing. The administration is leveraging the egg salmonella recall to
push this bill. Part of the biodiversity treaty is designed to eliminate
all human presence on more than 50% of US soil. One of the ways does this
is, it creates "battered willing sellers", from which the government will
purchase land. S510 is designed to consolidate food production into a few
large corporations, and frustrate small farmers. Estate taxes also create
battered sellers by placing a large tax burden on family farms when the
owner passes away. This is just one more way our sovereignty is
threatened, our next governor will have to address.
I also said, "However important vaccines are, no one should be forced to
be vaccinated or forced to submit to any medical procedure he does not wish to be subjected to, even if the procedure would save his life." Just
in this last week or so, Vanderbilt Medical began a push to require all
of it's employees to get flu vaccines. In the process, they revealed over
half did not get vaccines last year. Does that, tell you something when
Vanderbilt medical staff refuse vaccines? Do you remember the Army having
vaccination drills during the H1N1 scare? This is another way our
liberties are threatened, our next governor will have to address.
I also stood against sin taxes. Recently, we've seen a soda tax fail in
Tennessee, and a tanning bed tax pass Congress. Mark my words, they'll
eventually tax any foods the government deems unhealthy. PETA is also
trying to get a 50% tax on meat. Cap and tax is basically a sin tax on
CO2. I saw this coming. When I warn you about a UN and CFR take over of
Tennessee's government, do you think I am right? Please, do not give me
the opportunity to be proven right again. Sometimes, being able to say,
"I told you so." is very little consolation.
I want to make one last point about my stand, before I move on to endorse
Dr. Dodds. I opposed Race to the Top, because it was a continuation of
outcome based education, and it eroded local sovereignty. NEA supported
it, and SCORE underwrote it. Many of the forums across the state were
sponsored by SCORE. No candidate was allowed into a SCORE debate that
opposed race to the top. Many other forums across the state were
sponsored by League of Women Voters. My education platform held,
decisions should be made locally, not by the state or federal government.
LWV said, this did not qualify as an education plan, and denied me
entrance to three forums. The reason you don't see independent candidates
in most of the political forums is, we are not bought and paid for by
special interests like NEA, SCORE, and LWV. Furthermore, I opposed pre-K
education. It's more cradle to the grave government. There is no more
room in the budget for it. Either money will have to be diverted from
some other program, taxes will have to be raised, or money borrowed to
fund it. NEA, SCORE, and LWV also excluded this point of view from the
forums they hosted.

If you were not listening before now, pay attention. Over 200,000 people
voted in the Democrat primary this year. Over 700,000 people voted in the
Republican primary. Tennessee is a Republican state, but with cities like
Memphis, that have over 1,000,000 people who tend to vote Democrat, we
are not 3-1 Republican. The house is 49-49, and more people voted
Democrat in the 2006 primary than Republican. McWherter had this election
wrapped up 9 months ago. Liberal bloggers went to TEA Party web sites and
read who you supported. Later they bragged about voting for the most
liberal Republicans. Notice Republicans is plural. They didn't just cross
over for governor. They crossed over in all of the races in this state.
The result is, the primary left us with a choice between left and lefter.
If you consider the fact, 53% of the Republican votes were for someone
other than Haslam, and many of Haslam's votes will return to the Democrat
ticket, you can see the CFR and UN is very beatable. Fortunately, there
are independent candidates still in this race. If you consider yourself a
conservative voter, you have no excuse.
A vote for Haslam is a vote for the UN.
A vote for Haslam is a vote for the CFR.
A vote for Haslam is a vote for globalization.
A vote for Haslam is a vote for cap and trade.
A vote for Haslam is a vote for dependency on foreign oil.
A vote for Haslam is a vote for taxes and wasteful spending.
A vote for Haslam is a vote for special interests.
A vote for Haslam is a vote for SCORE, NEA, and LWV.
A vote for Haslam is a vote against state sovereignty.
A vote for Haslam is a vote against the 2nd amendment.
A vote for Haslam is a vote against individual liberty.
A vote for Haslam is a vote against property rights.
The idea of voting for the lesser of two evils has to be one of the
dumbest concepts ever to gain popular acceptance. It is right up there
with "the enemy of my enemy is my friend." Sometimes, the enemy of your
enemy is still your enemy. We supported Bin Laden when he fought the
Russians. We supported Saddam Hussein when he fought the Persians. How
did that work out for us? If you are voting for the lesser of two evils,
you're still voting for evil. And that, makes you personally responsible
for the outcome!

Our ancestors, Davy Crockett, Daniel Boone, and others laid down their
lives for God and Country. How much less of a sacrifice is a laying down
a campaign? I stepped down today, so several good independent candidates
would not divide the votes of patriots, handing over our government to a
Democrat or Republican in these perilous times. Don't let my warnings go
unheeded. Brandon's campaign needs dollars, action, and votes to win. We
can't defeat the UN and CFR without your support.



You know everyone is petrified of the Moslems.
Well ask yourself a few questions.
Who is bringing them in?
Who is paying for them?
What about all these mouthpieces who are warning US
about the dangers of Islam to our beloved United States?
How much money are they making in the process?

Don't you feel like a sucker?????

The best strategy in dealing with this problem is to have the House of Representatives
cut off the money.

The famous Samuel Duck letter.

Yes I fear Islam
But I fear the governments proposals to deal with it more.
I fear their solutions in the form of more legislation and court decisions are designed to strip from us whatever liberty and freedoms we Americans have left.
More Islam More Terrorism. Their solutions are more Government. More Programs, More Employees, Higher Costs, More rules and regulations and eventually you have total government.
Total government becomes totalitarian and they you are left with a Communist Dictatorship


Failure Is Success

Another weapon in the arsenal of liberty. This message on my truck. I hope you like it.

"Failure Is Success" is another con game that is being perpetuated on the citizens of these United States.
Take a program, any program that has just started operating. This program is supposed to do something. It fails in its mission and the immediate response is to give the bureaucrats who administer that program more power, more money.
The program gets bigger and bigger and bigger!

That is the “Success.” More and bigger government and we are paying for it.

The solution to this and other problems is to have the House of Representatives cut the funding for the government in the reverse fashion that it was expanded.

Oh, if you see my truck on the road I would appreciate a thumbs up.

Wednesday, February 1, 2012

Gun Control And I Choose To Control Mine

A hell of a question

"If we turn in all of our guns to the government.
What is to protect us from the government????"
Ms. Schlockmeister
This was part of an interview on a radio station in California.
It was between my friend Charlie Smith and a Ms. Schlockmeister.
She was an ACLU lawyer, An advocate of Gun Control, A proponent of disarming civilians, Member of Mensa and other intellectual societies.
Ms Schlockmeister had nothing to say after that line.
I wonder why????


Why was the Second Amendment put into the Constitution?


So that we could protect ourselves from the government!

Other measures to protect US from the government were:

1) The Fedgov could have no army in peacetime.

2) Fedgov could not quarter troops in our houses

3) Fedgov could send troops into a state only with the consent of the state government or during an insurrection.


Without an army how could the federal government defend the country against invasion and war?


By calling out the militia: Each state had an organized militia under the control of the state government (the officers were trained by the federal government).


What was to prevent the state government from using the militia against its own citizens?


To regulate that is to control the militia the Founder's said "Arm the entire population"

That is the Second Amendment.

In the "Federalist Papers" the founders asserted that the combined militias of the states would be stronger than any force the Federal Government could raise, and by the same reasoning an armed population would be stronger than any militia a State Government could use against its citizens.

The Second Amendment has nothing whatsoever to do with hunting, sportsmanship or target shooting:

The claim that it does has been made by people who want to exclude the ordinary citizens.

(Who are not hunters, sportsmen or target shooters) from the debate.

This allows those promoters to agree to a series of compromises which over time will disarm the people and leave US at the mercy of the government.

If you are a gun owner in America, vote for Leonard " Lenny" Ladner for the House of Representatives, Seventh District of Tennessee.

Please visit me on the web at

And You Thought They Were On Your Side

Are you in for a rude awakening

Let’s talk about government bureaucracies that we know are screwing us.
And groups that are supposed to protect people like you and me from these agencies.
I would like to use trucking as an example but this concept can be expanded to firearms, land, agriculture, trade and others. Use the brain that G-D gave you and you can expand this idea without me being the guide.
Let’s say that you have one government agency that regulates the trucking industry.
In reality you probably have 50 of these agencies that have something to DO with trucking. However for the sake of this argument let’s say you have one.
Bureaucratic Lunacy

This agency makes its own rules, regulations, codes, guidelines and standards.
They publish said rules, regulations, codes, guidelines and standards in the Federal Register and they have the power of law.
Now let’s say that this agency made 1,000 new rules, regulations, codes, guidelines and standards in a year’s period of time. That is a lot of shit being vomited on you by the masters in Washington DC.
Now let’s say that we truckers are paying a group to fight this government agency.
Our group takes 4 or 5 of the most egregious of these rules, regulations, codes, guidelines and standards and fights them. They may even get these 4 or 5 rules thrown out.
Did we win a victory??????
Our advocacy group is beating its breast. They tell us how HARD they fought and how they beat the government at its own game. They want more dues paying members. They want all of its members to tell other truckers how great this group is and to solicit other truckers for membership.
Now what really happened????
The 4 or 5 rules will be put on the back burner and brought up again in a few years.
The other 995 new rules, regulations, codes, guidelines and standards are in force.
The trucking industry has just been shackled with 995 more rules, regulations, codes, guidelines and standards. The government has just grown by 995 new rules, regulations, codes, guidelines and standards. Our advocacy group hasn’t accomplished anything.
If anything they lost.
Now if a trucking industry advocacy group wants to really get something done it should tell its members that we must have the House of Representatives cut off the money that is used to enforce these new rules, regulations, codes, guidelines and standards in the budgetary process.
What would happen to a proposal to put “black boxes” in trucks if the House of Representatives cut off the money???
It would be dead. No black boxes.
What would happen to this Federal Trucking Regulatory agency if the House of Representatives cut its funding in the following way?
In the 2014 budget all increases from 2013 will not be funded.
In the 2015 budget all increases from 2012 will not be funded.
In the 2016 budget all increases from 2011 will not be funded.
In the 2017 budget all increases from 2010 will not be funded.
You are cutting the government back in size, cost, reach and power in the reverse order it was expanded.
All of a sudden this government agency that is regulating trucking will disappear.
Now apply this concept to any other Federal Racketeering Agency and tell me what happens???
We will decrease the Size, Cost, Reach and Power of the government.
How come OOIDA and other such groups can’t come up with that program????
Thought you ought to know.

Fighting The Enemy

OOIDA and the NRA
Are there to take your time and money away.
People think that OOIDA and the NRA

Are there to make the government’s tyranny go away.


OOIDA and the NRA are there to make your time and money go away!